Category: Uncategorized

  • The Cartography of Culture

    The Cartography of Culture

    I’m excited to announce I have a book coming out in June (2027) with B&H Academic!

    Have you ever had a conversation with someone from another religious background and were surprised to hear them say things that didn’t seem to match their religion? This is common, actually. What is uncommon is a model that helps a Christian working cross-culturally to clarify the complexity of an individual’s worldview in a way that prioritizes what they believe in their heart without disregarding the reality of their religious background. My book attempts to accomplish this with a process called worldview mapping. The goal is to help Christians better communicate the gospel as they navigate the reality of a world in which most people are highly influenced by overlapping and conflicting worldviews. I’m not trying to teach people to throw a strike. I’m just getting them in the ball park.

    I have been teaching this process for around five years now and have received enough encouragement that I decided last year to make a proposal to B&H Academic. I’m super grateful they accepted and am excited to have turned in the final manuscript! Stay tuned…

  • Mission in the Midst of a Global Pornography Epidemic: A 3D Gospel Approach for Addicts

    Mission in the Midst of a Global Pornography Epidemic: A 3D Gospel Approach for Addicts

    This article was originally published in the Great Commission Research Journal in the Fall of 2019. I edited it in 2026.

    Abstract

    This article discusses the problem of pornography from a missiological perspective, especially concerning the contexts of Guilt/Innocence, Shame/Honor, and Fear/Power. The scope of the global problem is explained as well as specific issues related to the problem in the United States and Nigeria. Possible solutions to the problem in specific contexts are presented. 

    INTRODUCTION

    In his 2013 book Pressure Points: Twelve Global Issues Shaping the Face of the Church, J.D. Payne included a chapter on what he called the “Pornification of Societies.” This chapter captured my attention because of what seemed to me like twin realities: On the one hand, I had seen the problem throughout the world, especially in Southeast Asia, where I served from 2005-2010 as a student church planter and professor of youth ministry in a Malaysian seminary. On the other hand, I had never read a missiologist’s inclusion of this as a major problem in the cultures we aim to reach.

    I was awakened to the true scope of the problem in 2009, two months after teaching a two-week course, “Discipleship in Youth Ministry,” in Penang, Malaysia. A youth minister from Jakarta emailed to thank me for what he learned in the course. Specifically, he let me know that he had found the power to defeat his pornography addiction. He proceeded from there to tell me how he had already shared the good news of his newfound freedom to both his youth workers and his youth group. Horrified at what was sure to be an unfolding scandal in the church, I immediately responded in order to help him through the fallout. Astoundingly, the only thing that surprised anyone was his self-control. While the extreme nature of this story is not necessarily normative throughout Malaysia or Indonesia, it serves to illustrate the fact that Christians around the world are struggling with pornography addiction.

     Resources and ministries do, in fact, exist to help western Christians with pornography addiction (including missionaries), and many mission agencies have policies in place to screen future missionaries.[1] Little has been written, however, to help missionaries specifically engage their new cultures with the gospel and disciple Christians in culturally appropriate ways when it comes to pornography addiction. Therefore, after examining the global scope of the problem, this article will seek to frame the global pornography crisis through a missiological lens in order to begin asking the right questions regarding how we can assist missionaries and majority world church leaders. 

    The Global Scope of the Problem

    One of the major online pornography distributors, PornHub, allows users to upload homemade videos, increasing revenue by receiving free content and charging others to view it. While comprehensive and accurate statistics for individual countries are difficult to find (especially non-Western countries), their 2018 report makes two things very clear: 1. The amount of pornography being consumed on an annual basis is staggering. 2. It’s a global issue. Below are a few of the highlights relevant to this paper.  

    •  If you began watching all of the videos uploaded in 2018 just after the Wright brothers’ first flight in 1903, you would still be watching them today.
    •   If you began watching all of the videos uploaded on PornHub to date (including everything before 2018 as well) when the first telegraph was sent in 1844, you would still be watching.
    •  Every minute on PornHub, 7708GB of data are transferred, 63,992 people visit the site, 207,405 videos are viewed, and 10,498 hours of pornography are consumed.
    •  The top four countries, measured by overall traffic, are the United States, the United Kingdom, India, and Japan. 
    •   The top two countries, measured by time spent per visit, are the Philippines and South Africa.
    •   The most viewed category in Asia – from Southeast Asia, into China, and across Mongolia into Russia – is Hentai, a pornographic spinoff of anime and manga.[2]

    While such comprehensive data is difficult to find elsewhere, there is no shortage of localized research to illustrate that porn use can be found in almost all corners of the globe, including countries we think of as holding “conservative values.” A 2017 article from Fight the New Drug cites statistics from a SimilarWeb analysis on global porn consumption, specifically discussing the overall percentages of adult entertainment websites compared to other categories such as travel, news media, arts and entertainment, and shopping.[3] While the overall average is 4.4%, the countries with the largest shares of porn websites are Iran, Egypt, Serbia, and Japan.[4] The same report showed the countries with the highest numbers of pages viewed per visit were Hong Kong, Norway, Netherlands, and Singapore.[5]  

    The harmful effects of pornography addiction on society are as numerous as they are profound. Below are just a few of the issues confirmed by various studies. Pornography addiction:

    • Increases the risk of divorce.[6]
    • Is a cause of erectile dysfunction.[7]
    • Rewires the brain and creates the need for darker forms of porn.[8]
    • Changes sexual preferences.[9]
    • Increases the demand for prostitution, which is met by sex trafficking.[10]

    If pornography addiction among Christians in other countries is anything close to what exists in the American church, then there are massive implications for discipleship. For example, if we are teaching new believers how to read the Bible and apply it to their lives but we’re not addressing the issue that has them in daily bondage to sin, their growth will be truncated. While we are equipping them for evangelism and executing our plans for multiplication of churches, they will be sitting in silent shame over their addiction, wondering how God could use someone in their spiritual condition. In the midst of the challenge, however, there is also an opportunity to make the gospel even more relevant to their lives.

    A Missiological View of a Global Crisis

     Having briefly looked at the enormity of the problem, I will move forward with the desire to demonstrate what it looks like to address the issue missiologically. More specifically, I will peer through the lenses of Guilt/Innocence (GI), Shame/Honor (SH), and Fear/Power (FP) to examine the cultural issues involved with addressing the pornography epidemic. Each one of these lenses presents a different way in which a culture may understand right from wrong. Peering through each, we can also look to Scripture to see how the lenses help us to see a different dimension of the gospel that is addressed clearly in the grand narrative of Scripture. While this will be explained in greater detail later, a short introduction follows.

    • Cultures that lean primarily toward Guilt/Innocence (GI) view right and wrong primarily based on an understanding of justice and the law. The gospel is most clearly understood, then, as salvation from guilt and the penalty of sin.
    • Cultures that lean primarily toward Shame/Honor (SH) understand right and wrong based on what grants honor (both to themselves and their families and communities) and avoids shame. The gospel is most clearly understood, then, in terms of salvation from their shame and how God grants them an honorable position as a son or daughter of the Most High.
    • Cultures that lean primarily toward Fear/Power (FP; mostly animistic cultures) see life as a struggle for spiritual power in order to attain what they need. What is right is simply determined by what the individual god or spirit demands from someone in order to gain favor. The gospel is most easily understood, then, as salvation from the domain of darkness into the kingdom of a sovereign and good God, who is more powerful than all other spirits.

    In the end, each of these aspects of the gospel is true for everyone, and an imbalance of understanding leads to a truncated gospel, as I will illustrate. It should also be noted that I will primarily focus on the struggles of men.[11]

    In the sections below, I will examine both Nigeria and the United States in light of the primary dimensions of the gospel employed by the church in order to combat pornography addiction, followed by the limitations of each approach. I will then propose a three-dimensional gospel-based approach to the issue of pornography, noting those aspects that will resonate differently in each culture.

    The United States

    The culture at large has become very accepting of pornography, yet there is clear schizophrenia at work. On the one hand, our culture tells us that modesty, boundaries, and warnings about lust are repressive. However, when men act out and treat women as objects of lust, people act surprised and offended.

    The church in the United States, for all its orientation toward guilt, has not displayed much more self-control than the culture. Covenant Eyes reports the following among churchgoers:

    • Forty-one percent of Christian males, 13-24, use porn at least once per month.
    • Twenty-three percent of Christian males, 25 and over, use porn at least once per month.
    • Fifteen percent of Christian women use porn at least once per month.
    • One in five youth pastors use porn at least once per month.
    • One in seven U.S. senior pastors use porn at least once per month.[13]

    Guilt/Innocence Behaviorism

    While the culture is growing in its orientation toward SH, the church remains clearly rooted in a certain GI understanding of the gospel, an approach I will refer to as GI Behaviorism. An FP understanding is sometimes present when it comes to the discussion of spiritual warfare, but outside of Pentecostals and charismatics, it is not a primary lens through which to view pornography addiction. The majority of pornography resources in the West have tended toward a GI perspective. When the gospel fails to deal with shame, however, it tends toward a legalistic approach that is better described as “behavior modification.” In other words, justification is by faith, but ongoing sanctification is a work we do on our own. Instead of entering into our ongoing sin, God stands at a distance, waiting for us to pick ourselves up by our proverbial bootstraps. In Surfing for God, John Michael Cusick explains how this plays out in the church. “Understanding shame is crucial in our journey from lust and addiction to freedom. This can be especially confusing and complex in the church, where leaders and laypeople often use condemnation, judgment, and shame to motivate people toward the ‘right behavior.’”[15] Instead of helping to uncover the roots of shame and leading men toward healing, more shame is heaped upon them. Such an approach simply drives sin underground and solidifies a determination among men to never let anyone know their struggles. This can cause addicts to miss the gospel, leading them to minimize sin and grasp onto “quick fix” approaches to healing.

    Nigeria

     “There is an epidemic that nobody is talking about,” writes Leke Babayomi, a Nigerian engineer in the aerospace industry. “We appear to be focused on physical and economic prosperity to the detriment of emotional, mental and spiritual prosperity. The well-being of the present generation is fast-declining due to pornography and its offshoots. . . .  The pornography epidemic is real.”[17] Citing Google statistics, Subomi Plumptre writes:

    In 2015, the popularity of Nigerian Google searches for porn (relative to other searches) on a scale of 0 to 100 was above 80. (Google ranks as 100 any item that constitutes 10% or more of all searches in a country). . . . The relative popularity of rape porn videos was also above 80. . . . In 2014, Nigeria ranked third globally for the most Google searches for Gay Porn.[18]

    “I believe most Nigerians are FP-oriented first and SH-oriented second,” asserts Christson Adedoyin.[19] Although Adedoyin, a Nigerian professor in Samford University’s School of Public Health in Birmingham, Alabama, is entrenched in the world of Western education, he is not a “Westernized” Christian. His prayer life and view of the spirit world carry the clear marks of a fervent majority world Christianity. Like many Nigerian believers, his first instinct when dealing with the issue of pornography is to pray against the demonic powers oppressing the believer.[20] While Nigerians, unlike Americans, are generally in agreement that engaging in pornography is wrong, their reason for condemning it is rooted in FP. Explaining his culture in general, Adedoyin says that “they believe it’s wrong because it opens you up to a spiritual husband or wife. They believe that a Christian can allow themselves to be possessed. They tell you that ‘contact’ means ‘contract.’ Contact with pornography means contract with a spiritual husband or wife, which then opens them up to spiritual attacks, visiting a brothel, masturbation, etc.”[21] In other words, it is to be avoided ultimately because of the consequences.

    Deliverance Only

    Because the issue of pornography is seen by many Nigerian Christians as a demonic attack, the primary approach for healing is what I will call Deliverance Only. Similar to GI Behaviorism, it seeks a quick fix that leaves little room for the slow healing of root issues that takes place when SH gospel implications are taught and believed.

    There are several unfortunate consequences of this particular one-dimensional approach. First, while blaming Satan or a demon has a certain convenience to it, it also carries a stigma and, inevitably, like GI Behaviorism, leads to a minimization of sin. In other words, a person having sex in their dreams with someone other than their spouse has a demon. The pornography addict has a demon as well, but the intensely prideful Christian leader wreaking havoc in the church is not seen to be possessed and needs no deliverance. The Deliverance Only approach not only overlooks personal responsibility for sin – thus, erasing the function of guilt – but it also seems to place an inordinate amount of blame on women. Adedoyin explains, “They’d rather play that there’s a power, demon, or stronghold that’s actually causing them to do this. And they tend to blame the woman, that she is an instrument of the Devil. Even when pastors abuse and take advantage of the women, the blame is put on the lady.”[22]

    While it is not my intention to prove that GI Behaviorism and Deliverance Only are used by a majority of Christians in their respective countries, they are prevalent enough to serve as effective test cases which illustrate how one-dimensional gospel approaches to difficult cultural issues fall short. The true gospel, as Jayson Georges writes, “is a many-sided diamond, and God wants people in all cultures to experience his complete salvation.”[23] In the remainder of the paper, I will attempt to illustrate the depths of the gospel for the pornography addict by holding up the three facets of FP, SH, and GI to gospel light.

    A Three-Dimensional Gospel for the Pornography Addict

    Fear/Power Gospel

    Creation and The Fall. In the beginning, a loving and sovereign God created the entire universe by his powerful word. His power is absolute, and he rules over all of creation. He made humans in his own image and made them vice-regents, even letting them name the animals. After Satan rebelled against God’s kingdom, he schemed against humanity and tempted Adam and Eve to seek power outside of the rule of God. As a result, humans lost their powerful position, causing fear and death to enter the world. Satan continually uses fear to tempt men and women to grasp at false idols of power they think will meet their needs, but all of them fail. “That’s what the Devil is always up to,” writes Russell Moore, “offering both the sin that rejects Christ but also the rescue plans that bypass Christ.”[24] 

    God created sex to be enjoyed by a man and a woman, each created in his image and equal before him. As they serve the Lord, they are to serve each other in their different roles. After their nature was corrupted through sin, however, they were tempted to think of each other as less than the image of God. This view led men to seek power over women in order to use them to fulfill their sexual urges outside of the union of a loving marriage. Lust aroused a craving for men to use their strength to get what they want and to get it now.

    In pornography, the man feels a false sense of control over the woman on the screen. At times the woman is smiling and flirting, making him feel wanted and secure. In other scenarios, he watches her say “no,” only to see a man physically overtake her in rape, even successfully making her groan in ecstasy only minutes later. Either way, with a swipe or a simple click of a mouse, the user exercises complete control over the way he views the woman. In the end, man’s grasp at sexual power always ends up the same way. Satan, having successfully tempted man to grasp for a false god, turns the tables and exerts his dominion over man.

    While the FP perspective is obvious to Nigerians, Tray Lovvorn (former leader of a recovery ministry) admitted, “I’ve never thought about the FP paradigm,” but he then quickly related it to darker forms of pornography, such as BDSM.[25] A writer for a women’s student group at Appalachian State confidently explains, “A common myth about BDSM is that it is ‘all about pain.’ In actuality, it is about the exchange of power and pleasure.”[26] While it is obvious why someone desiring power would want to engage in BDSM as a “dominant,” according to Lovvorn there is a pattern in the genre where the person who seeks to be submissive is actually a powerful person in real life. In what could be seen as an unconscious recognition of the limits of their own strength, successful CEOs spend all day every day being sought after for answers and then proceed to gain pleasure in the night from being told what to do. In addition, there is a relatively new genre called POV (“Point of View”) that is filmed from the vantage point of the man. “You can put yourself in the scene. It’s easy for a man to feel powerful because they don’t feel that in real life, but they can go here and feel that domination.”[27]

    Redemption, Sanctification, and Glorification. God brought freedom from the dominion of darkness through the incarnated Son, Jesus Christ, who inaugurated the kingdom of God. Satan offered Jesus partnership in his rule, but instead, Jesus remained intent on overthrowing his temporary kingdom and freeing everyone under the power of the Evil One. The demons thought they had triumphed when they crucified Jesus, but the plan backfired. Jesus disarmed the powers and authorities and demonstrated his supreme power by rising from the dead. Mankind must repent of following all other powers and submit to Jesus as sovereign Lord of their lives. As they do so, they are not left alone in their battle against Satan. God’s Holy Spirit, a much stronger spirit than those which exist in the world, indwells every believer. The apostle Paul explained to the Ephesians that there is “immeasurable greatness of power toward us who believe, according to the working of his great might that he worked in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places” (Eph 1:19-20, ESV). He instructed the new followers of Jesus to “be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil” (Eph 6:10-11). Those who submit to the rule of God will one day reign with him in a new and glorious kingdom that will never end.

    Nigeria

    Gailyn Van Rheenen defines animism as “the belief that personal spiritual beings and impersonal spiritual forces have power over human affairs and, consequently, that human beings must discover what beings and forces are influencing them in order to determine future action and, frequently, to manipulate their power.”[28] The animistic background of Nigeria alerts the missiologist to the twin dangers Paul Hiebert warned us about – both secularism and a “Christianized form of animism.”[29]

    Therefore, on the one hand, the missionary should not write off the reality of the spirit world in everyday events. To do so would not only hinder credibility, but it also would contradict Scripture, which alerts us to the fact that Satan is a prowling lion, seeking whom he may devour (1 Pet 5:8, ESV). Even if it were successful, this approach would limit all of life to materialistic explanations. On the other hand, if the default approach to dealing with pornography addiction is Deliverance Only, there is potential to treat God’s Holy Spirit simply as a power to be wielded. According to Adedoyin, when people come to Christ, it is both to be saved from demonic powers and out of fear of being disconnected. They want to have a “super-power that is more powerful than their ancestral power.”[30] The story of Simon the Magician, however, serves as a stark warning to the person who desires to be in control of the Spirit of God, instead of vice versa (Acts 8:14-24). 

    The practical question from all of this seems to be the following: “When encountering someone with a pornography addiction, do we pray for deliverance from the forces of darkness?” A subset of questions follows: “Is this a legitimate scenario where the missionary should be open to a power encounter?” “If we don’t deal directly with the demonic, will that diminish our credibility?” “Will praying against demonic oppression in this scenario help some and increase shame in others?” “How does the demonic realm influence people to give in to pornography?” “Is this to be considered possession, necessitating prayers of deliverance or is this to be considered demonic influence?” “When someone reveals they are having sex with someone in their dreams, do we dismiss the idea of a spirit husband/wife and instead ask if they are looking at pornography?” Lastly, “Is the choice of either a power encounter or teaching the deeper dimensions of the gospel a false dichotomy?” The answer to these questions will determine the course of action that a missionary or national church leader will pursue.

    United States

    While stressing that the Bible instructs us to resist the Devil, Moore writes, “The pull to temptation, whether to pornography or to some other act of self-destruction, can feel so bewildering precisely because it is, quite literally, bedeviling. This is spiritual warfare.”[31] It would be a mistake, therefore, to think that a person who doesn’t believe in the spirit world does not need to know its underlying reality in their lives.

    When working with men, one of the goals must be to help them see that they are more than just their physical desires, and that being a man does not mean a superficial show of strength. Instead, they are to seek the strength that comes from being directly under the authority of our Sovereign Lord.

    Guilt/Innocence Gospel

    Creation and The Fall. The essence of God’s character is holiness. His righteousness and justice are above human understanding. In the beginning, God created man and woman in his image, placing them in a perfect garden and desiring that they worship him in holiness. Their sin against God’s clear command defiled them and placed a barrier between corrupted mankind and a perfect God. Because God cannot be in the presence of sin, he cast them out of the garden.

    The law of Moses, as made clear in the Ten Commandments, forbade adultery to the Israelites. Those who transgressed this law were guilty of a heinous sin. While the Jewish leaders of Jesus’ day understood this command, punishing the guilty with fervor, they overlooked their own iniquity. Jesus exposed this minimization of sin by teaching that those who look on a woman with lust have already committed adultery in their hearts (Matt 5:27-28). Modern pornography has the dramatic effect of stoking the fires of lust within men and heaping a million gallons of gasoline into their souls. Lust leads men to engage in pornography, and pornography multiplies lust and guilt before a holy God.

    Redemption, Sanctification, and Glorification. Although God provided Israel a temporary means to be forgiven through the sacrificial system, this was ultimately a foreshadowing of the perfect Lamb of God, Jesus Christ. He died on the cross bearing the full weight of our guilt. His resurrection defeated death and Hell, the penalty for our sin. In Jesus, “we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace” (Eph 1:7, ESV). Because we cannot earn his forgiveness by any human effort, we are to simply place our faith in Jesus and trust him with our lives. Following Jesus in faith means that we daily repent of sin, allowing the Holy Spirit to fill us and empower us to holy living. We will not be perfect in this life, but in the life to come, there will be no sin. Unrepentant sinners, however, will be forever cast out of the presence of God.

    Nigeria

    The holiness of God and the guilt of our transgressions are absolute truths, regardless of whether or not we feel guilty. The New Testament letters reveal a pattern that begins with the foundation of forgiveness by grace through faith, then progresses to command specific repentance. Nowhere is the church excused of sin on the basis of being possessed by the Devil. While the missionary and national believer should deal frankly with the demonic, they should not neglect the holiness of God by letting people believe they are innocent of their own actions. Instead, they should gently lead them toward repentance and help them with clear action steps to change their behavior in the strength of the Holy Spirit. The primary question to be answered, however, is “Do we lead with GI or do we start by connecting with FP or SH truths?”

    Given that GI cultures tend to favor a scientific view of reality, it is appropriate at this point to ask what role the missionary should give to the scientific evidence behind pornography addiction. As previously discussed, we do not want to replace animism with secularism. In addition, there may be barriers that hinder receptivity. Adedoyin explains:

    Our culture has come to the point to where everything that happens has a spiritual undertone. . . . If a building collapses, they don’t look at the structural defect and, instead, see bloodsucking demons in the area. That’s why the science would have a problem. . . . They would not accept the fact that there are neurological parts of your brain that, because of chemical releases, cause reinforcement of behavior. Science? Oh my goodness! That’s going to be a tough sell. They’d rather go for the explanation that there is a spiritual husband or wife.[34]

    United States

    The West generally is grounded in a GI understanding of sin. Coupled with a scientific view of reality, this makes the church prone to a GI Behaviorism approach, as discussed above. While a GI understanding of sin does not, in fact, necessitate a legalistic understanding of the gospel, the lack of understanding of how the SH dimension of the gospel relates to us as beloved sons and daughters of the king open us up to such a misunderstanding (This will be addressed below). Nevertheless, while the church consistently sees through the lens of GI, the culture at large is slowly changing toward an SH paradigm. Therefore, we should not assume that all Americans have either a strong sense of guilt or a complete lack of shame over their use of pornography. 

    Shame/Honor Gospel.

    Creation and the Fall. God is an eternal and glorious king. He has always existed and is the essence of true honor. He created Adam and Eve in a sublime universe as a way to share his glory and honor. Their very purpose was to glorify God, honoring and enjoying him forever. Their name was perfectly honorable, and their inheritance was secure. They walked naked and were unashamed, having perfect intimacy with the Lord and with each other. “To be naked and unashamed before God,” Cusick explains, “meant that Adam and Eve were both free and able to offer to God exactly who they were, without holding anything back or hiding their true selves. They were fully known, just as they were created to be, and they were fully okay with that. This led to an uninhibited intimacy with God and with each other.”[35]

    One day they decided to seek a status outside of what God had given them – an honor they could both earn and manufacture themselves. The betrayal brought shame on Adam and Eve, causing God to lose face from the dishonorable act. Because God had to protect his dignity, he banished them from the beautiful garden in which they had lived together in perfect harmony. The descendants of Adam and Eve have inherited both their name and their shame. Our various cultural attempts to create honor on our own disconnect us from each other as everyone grasps for titles and status to make us feel superior. Our sin (gossip, anger, sexual immorality, war, racism, etc.) is mostly from our futile attempts at self-honor. In the end, it only increases shame and further separates the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve as we see everywhere echoes of the Fall. As Cusick points out, “Even in the garden, shame’s first words to Adam and Eve were, ‘You’d better go hide.’”[36]

    When young men begin to engage in pornography, they commonly feel a heightened status as they impress their friends with newfound knowledge of sexuality. Young men not looking at porn feel shame in such situations, feeding their embarrassment and disconnection with each other. There is a false sense of intimacy lingering underneath the surface, however, even for men who believe they are only looking for physical pleasure. Our innate desire for true community – to be really known – drives us to seek the counterfeit, as we are too ashamed to show others who we really are. Cusick elaborates:

    Augustine taught about the theological idea of incurvatus se – a life turned in on itself. Porn successfully accomplishes this – it causes our soul to turn in on itself in self-absorbed isolation and shame. . . . It seduces a man to use women to meet a need in himself – without meeting any of her needs. And this act of ‘using’ comes not only at her expense but also at the devastating cost of his own heart.[37] 

    Redemption, Sanctification, and Glorification.  Because God still loved mankind, he made a way to restore their honor. He covenanted with Abraham to honor him with many descendants who would ultimately bless all families of the earth. Israel (Abraham’s descendants) inherited the covenant and were given the Torah as a way to honor God among the nations. Although they were often disloyal and ended up in exile, just like Adam and Eve, God satisfied the demands of his own honor through his Son. Jesus was filled with the same honor and distinction as God the Father. He chose to be with the marginalized of society, filling them with the unexpected honor of his presence. He touched the sick and was not defiled. He even honored sexual sinners with his presence, causing the religious leaders of his day to heap shame upon him. Undeterred, this did not change how Jesus felt about sinners. “He didn’t shame sexually broken people. When he encountered a Samaritan woman with a history of failed relationships, he offered her a drink of living water.”[38]

    Jesus sabotaged the false honor code of the people by seeking only God’s honor while freely granting it to others. Eventually, he was stripped, beaten, and shamed through a bloody death on a cross. It was on this cross, however, that he bore the shame of humanity, breaking its power, and he triumphed over death as God raised him from the dead.

    Jesus is now able to offer a new status as beloved and honored sons and daughters to all those who reject society’s counterfeit honor and place their identity in him as adopted children. Paul wrote that “he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love, he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ” (Eph 1:4-5). Those whom he chooses inherit his honorable name and a new status as honored princes and princesses in a kingdom that will last forever.

    United States

    It is true that the culture of the United States is individualistic and GI-oriented, but it would be a mistake to think that shame is not both intuitively understood and intensely felt. Shame is felt both intensely and often.

    The real breakthrough for many people in their struggle with pornography is the realization that God still loves them even in their sin and relentless negative emotions. After all, God has adopted them as children and this was never based on anything they had done. God has sealed them with his Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:13) and he does not leave them when they sin. God’s very presence is with us.

    As Andrew Comiskey wrote, “Shame is the raincoat over the soul repelling the living water of Jesus that would otherwise establish us as the beloved of God.”[40] When we believe that no one can truly know us and still love us, however, we both refuse the gospel and hide from others.

    For many Christians, it is in the realm of SH that they have found the antidote to the legalistic GI Behaviorism.

    To further defeat the power of shame, many pornography recovery ministries emphasize the importance of community.[42] When believers try to battle pornography in isolation, the shame-filled voices become louder. In Monica Lewinsky’s famous 2015 Ted Talk entitled, “The Price of Shame,” she revealed the secret of overcoming the intense and tragically unique experience resulting from both poor choices made in her early twenties and the advent of cable news. When everyone else shunned her and made jokes at her expense, there were others who entered into her life and remained friends regardless. Her conclusion was that “shame cannot survive empathy.”[43]

    In the gospel, God himself enters our shameful state, granting us worth and status beyond comprehension simply because of his presence. Furthermore, as beloved sons and daughters enter into each other’s presence as saved sinners, opening up with who they really are, what would otherwise be crushing public shame is instead defeated by loving empathy.

    Nigeria[44]

    The insights above concerning an SH understanding for Americans are extremely relevant and powerful for Nigerian Christians as well. The context is what is different. Americans feel shame in an intensely personal way, but the public aspect of it is something that is only beginning to catch up to true SH cultures such as Nigeria. Brené Brown defines honor as “the worth or value of persons both in their eyes and in the eyes of their village, neighborhood, or society. . . . The critical item is the public nature of respect and reputation.”[45] Shame, therefore, can be understood not only in the experience of believing that we are unworthy but also in the fear of losing face and being disconnected from the community. Zeba Crook elaborates on this idea by pointing to the social dynamic in biblical cultures. “Shame among the males with honor . . . was not an emotion, but a demotion.”[46]

    There are two important implications here when it comes to dealing with pornography addiction in an SH-oriented culture. First of all, sin should be understood not simply in GI terminology, but by employing the biblical language pervasive in the Bible related to shame and honor. Georges and Baker, elaborating on the Westminster Catechism, explain. “Morality revolves around a God-honoring faith. Bringing honor and glory to God functions as the ethical standard. This implies there are situations in which people ‘sin’ without ever breaking a rule or commandment (Rom. 14:21-23). According to Romans 3:23, the target all humans miss is properly glorifying God, not an impersonal legal code of moral behavior.”[47] In other words, pornography use should be explained as dishonoring the Father and shaming the naked woman, created in his image. It is shameful behavior that radically impacts God’s design for marriage and family. Perhaps it is this approach to understanding sin that would lead to a conviction otherwise lacking in an FP culture primarily concerned with manipulating spiritual powers for their own ends.

    Another issue within a culture heavily tilted toward understanding spiritual power as impersonal is that people are less likely to seek a personal relationship with God, much less intimacy with him. Nearness to God, however, is what the Scriptures offer. Perhaps when it is made clear that pornography draws us inward and disconnects believers from true community, the corresponding freedoms from this addiction will both be clearly grasped and warmly cherished. Whereas American Christians resonate with beloved son, Nigerian Christians will most likely resonate with honored son. Perhaps when the incredible honor given to the believer is made plain, it will be this facet in the gospel diamond that holds the other two in place. 

    CONCLUSION

    When pornography addiction is examined through the missiological lenses of FP, SH, and GI, the limitations of each culture’s gospel orientation become clear. Americans imbalanced toward GI tend to drift toward a legalistic understanding of the gospel that overlooks both spiritual warfare and how Jesus enters our shameful condition to help us with our sin. Nigerians imbalanced toward an FP understanding of spiritual power forsake personal responsibility for sin and neglect the innate desire for honor that is so prevalent in their own culture. Both of these approaches seek a “quick fix” which diverts their attention from deeper gospel truths and the roots of their own behavior. Ultimately, all three dimensions of the gospel are biblical, relevant, and extraordinarily helpful for all believers, regardless of culture.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Books

    Babayomi, Leke. Kill Porn Before it Kills You: Keys to Overcome the Three-Headed Monster of Lust, Pornography, and Masturbation. 2014, Kindle.

    Brown, Brené. Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way Parents Live, Love, and Lead. New York: Gotham, 2012.

    Comiskey, Andrew. Strength in Weakness: Healing Sexual and Relational Brokenness. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2003.

    Crook, Zeba A. Reconceptualizing Conversion: Patronage, Loyalty, and Conversion in the Religions of Ancient Mediterranean. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.

    Cusick, Michael John. Surfing for God: Discovering the Divine Desire Beneath Sexual Struggle. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2012.

    Georges, Jayson. The 3D Gospel: Ministry in Guilt, Shame, and Fear Cultures. Time Press, 2017, Kindle.

    Georges, Jayson, and Mark D. Baker. Ministering in Honor-Shame Cultures: Biblical Foundations and Practical Essentials. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016.

    Moore, Russell. The Gospel & Pornography. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2017, Kindle.

    Payne, J.D. Pressure Points: Twelve Global Issues Shaping the Face of the Church. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2013.

    Van Rheenen, Gailyn. Communicating Christ in Animistic Contexts. Pasadena: CA:

    William Carey Library, 1991.

    Articles

    Hiebert, Paul. “The Flaw of the Excluded Middle.” In Perspectives on the World Christian Movement, 4th ed., edited by Steve Hawthorne and Ralph Winter, Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library, 2009.

    Perry, Samuel L., and Cyrus Schleifer. “Till Porn Do Us Part? A Longitudinal Examination of Pornography Use and Divorce,” The Journal of Sex Research, 55:3 (2018), 284-296, DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1317709.

    Babayomi, Leke. “Combating the Pornography Addiction Epidemic,” Accessed March 14, 2019, https://www.bellanaija.com/2018/06/leke-babayomi-combating- pornography-addiction-epidemic/.

    Covenant Eyes, “Porn Stats 2018,” Accessed February 8, 2019, www.covenanteyes.com/lemonade/wp…/covenant-eyes-porn-stats-2018- edition.pdf.

    Farley, Melissa and Emily Schuckman, Jacqueline M. Golding, Kristen Houser, Laura Jarrett, Peter Qualliotine, & Michele Decker, “Comparing Sex Buyers with Men Who Don’t Buy Sex: ‘You can have a good time with the servitude’ vs. ‘You’re supporting a system of degradation,’” Report at Psychologists for Social Responsibility Annual Meeting, Boston, 2018. http://www.prostitutionresearch.com/pdfs/Farleyetal2011ComparingSexBuyer s.pdf). Fight the New Drug. “How Porn Changes the Brain,” Accessed March 13, 2019,

    ___________. “Sex Stats: Some Middle Eastern Countries Have the Biggest Shares of Porn Sites,” Accessed March 12, 2019, https://fightthenewdrug.org/sex-stats-who-are-the-biggest-consumers-of- internet-porn/.

    Plumptre, Subomi. “The Rise of Internet Porn & its Generational Impact,” Accessed March 21, 2019, https://subomiplumptre.com/wp- content/uploads/2016/03/Nigeria-and-Sexuality_Subomi-Plumptre_March-11-2016.pdf.

    Prior, Vicki. “Implications of Escalating Erectile Dysfunction in Youthful Men Resulting from Internet Pornography Use,” Accessed March 13, 2019, https://www.sexualhealthvisual.com/Video_by_Vikki_Prior_on_Implications_of_Escalating_Erectile_Dysfunction_in_Youthful_Men_Resulting_from_Internet_Pornography_Use.html.

    Westen, John-Henry. “Want to Stop Sex Trafficking? America’s Porn Addiction,” Accessed March 13, 2019, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johnhenry- westen/want-to-stop-sex-traffick_b_6563338.html.

    About the Author

    David Parks, Ph.D., is Director of the Global Center at Beeson Divinity School, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama. He served as an International Mission Board missionary in Southeast Asia, and he also served with Youth Ministry International. He can be contacted at daparks@samford.edu.


    [1] Focus on the Family, “Resource List: Overcoming Sexual Brokenness,” accessed September 25, 2019,  http://media.focusonthefamily.com/topicinfo/overcoming_sexual_brokenness.pdf.

    [2] Pornhub, “2018 Year in Review,” accessed January 24, 2019, https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2018-year-in-review.

    [3] I was unable to find the original source of the report. This was frequently the case concerning significant studies such as this. Even studies reported by Google, and cited from a multitude of sources, remained elusive. This is one of the reasons I decided to shift the focus of the paper from an overview of the global epidemic to a cultural approach.  

    [4] “Sex Stats: Some Middle Eastern Countries Have the Biggest Shares of Porn Sites,” accessed March 12, 2019, https://fightthenewdrug.org/sex-stats-who-are-the-biggest-consumers-of-internet-porn/.

    [5] Ibid.

    [6] The Journal of Sex Research found the following: “The probability of divorce roughly doubled for married Americans who began pornography use between survey waves… Additional analyses also showed that the association between beginning pornography use and the probability of divorce was particularly strong among younger Americans, those who were less religious, and those who reported greater initial marital happiness.” Perry, Samuel L. and Cyrus Schleifer. “Till Porn Do Us Part? A Longitudinal Examination of Pornography Use and Divorce,” The Journal of Sex Research, 55:3 (2018), 284-296, DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1317709.

    [7] Sexual Health Visual, a multimedia scientific publication, asserts, “Research indicates that the escalation of erectile dysfunction in youthful men can be attributed to excessive internet pornography use. Usage through adolescence and early adulthood, when the brain is at its peak of neuroplasticity and Dopamine levels are at their highest, creates an environment of increased vulnerability to addiction.” Vikki Prior, “Implications of Escalating Erectile Dysfunction in Youthful Men Resulting from Internet Pornography Use,” accessed March 13, 2019, https://www.sexualhealthvisual.com/Video_by_Vikki_Prior_on_Implications_of_Escalating_Erectile_Dysfunction_in_Youthful_Men_Resulting_from_Internet_Pornography_Use.html.

    [8] A 2017 article on Fight the New Drug’s website asserted, “Repeated consumption of porn causes the brain to literally rewire itself. It triggers the brain to pump out chemicals and form new nerve pathways, leading to profound and lasting changes in the brain.” “How Porn Changes the Brain,” accessed March 13, 2019, https://fightthenewdrug.org/how-porn-changes-the-brain/.

    [9] A study presented at the Psychologists for Social Responsibility annual meeting in 2011, differentiating between “sex buyers” and non-sex buyers,” found the following: Sex buyers masturbated to pornography more often than non-sex buyers, imitated pornography with partners more often, and had more often received their sex education from pornography than the non-sex buyers. Over time, as a result of their prostitution and pornography use, sex buyers reported that their sexual preferences changed.  Melissa Farley, Emily Schuckman, Jacqueline M. Golding, Kristen Houser, Laura Jarrett, Peter Qualliotine, & Michele Decker, “Comparing Sex Buyers with Men Who Don’t Buy Sex: ‘You can have a good time with the servitude’ vs. ‘You’re supporting a system of degradation,’” Report at Psychologists for Social Responsibility Annual Meeting, Boston, 2018. http://www.prostitutionresearch.com/pdfs/Farleyetal2011ComparingSexBuyers.pdf).

    [10] Huffington Post cites sociologist Gail Dines from Wheelock College, who elaborates on the above. “We know that trafficking is increasing – which means demand is increasing. This means that men are increasingly willing to have sex with women who are being controlled and abused by pimps and traffickers… The biggest sex educator of young men today is pornography, which is increasingly violent and dehumanizing, and it changes the way men view women.” John-Henry Westen, “Want to Stop Sex Trafficking? America’s Porn Addiction,” accessed March 13, 2019, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johnhenry-westen/want-to-stop-sex-traffick_b_6563338.html.

    [11] The inherent risk of this is to subtly add shame to women who are struggling with pornography addiction, as if they were some kind of grotesque anomaly caught up in what is a male-only problem. Therefore, I want to start by affirming that the research is abundantly clear, both within the United States and abroad, that a significant percentage of women struggle with this as well. Ironically, one of the reasons I’m focusing on men is because pornography addiction radically hinders the ability of men to see women as created in the Imago Dei, thus exacerbating the issues of abuse and discrimination they already experience in male-dominated cultures.

    [12] Traylor Lovvorn, interview by author, March 15, 2019. This comment was in response to the fact that there is a #MeToo movement that largely refuses to condemn pornography.

    [13] “Porn Stats 2018,” accessed February 8,

    www.covenanteyes.com/lemonade/wp…/covenant-eyes-porn-stats-2018-edition.pdf

    [14] Lovvorn, interview. He also confirmed that this is changing.

    [15] Michael John Cusick, Surfing for God: Discovering the Divine Desire Beneath Sexual Struggle (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2012), 67

    [16] Lovvorn, interview.

    [17] Leke Babayomi, “Combating the Pornography Addiction Epidemic,” accessed March 14, 2019,  https://www.bellanaija.com/2018/06/leke-babayomi-combating-pornography-addiction-epidemic/.

    [18] Subomi Plumptre, “The Rise of Internet Porn & its Generational Impact,” accessed March 21, 2019, https://subomiplumptre.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Nigeria-and-Sexuality_Subomi-Plumptre_March-11-2016.pdf.

    [19] Christson Adedoyin, interview by author, March 8, 2019.

    [20] This is certainly not the case across the board among Nigerian Christians. For example, Leke Babayomi’s book, Kill Porn Before it Kills You: Keys to Overcome the Three-Headed Monster of Lust, Pornography, and Masturbation, reads much like an American Christian resource – outlining the problem and providing steps to overcome the problem. It includes prayer, but no emphasis on deliverance from demonic possession.

    [21] Adedoyin, interview. While Adedoyin has clear critiques of his culture’s over-emphasis of the spiritual, he does, in fact, believe in spiritual husbands and wives. The short explanation of a spiritual husband/wife is that, when someone has sex with a man or woman in their dreams who is not their spouse, it is a demon. When this subject came up in a class I was teaching, my instinct was to investigate a connection between this issue and pornography, which is why I interviewed him.

    [22] Adedoyin, interview.

    [23] Jayson Georges, The 3D Gospel: Ministry in Guilt, Shame, and Fear Cultures. (Time Press, 2017), chap. 1, Kindle.

    [24] Russell D. Moore, The Gospel & Pornography. (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, (2017), Introduction, Kindle.

    [25] BDSM is roughly short for bondage, dominance and submission, and sadism and masochism.

    [26] Amanda Ullman, “BDSM for Dummies,” accessed March 22, 2019, https://www.hercampus.com/school/app-state/bdsm-dummies

    [27] Lovvorn, interview.

    [28] Gailyn Van Rheenen, Communicating Christ in Animistic Contexts (Pasadena: CA: William Carey Library, 1991), 20.

    [29] Paul Hiebert, “The Flaw of the Excluded Middle,” in Perspectives on the World Christian Movement, 4th ed., edited by Steve Hawthorne and Ralph Winter. (Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library, 2009), 413.

    [30] Adedoyin, interview.

    [31] Russell Moore, The Gospel & Pornography. p. 36

    [32] Lovvorn, interview.

    [33] Ibid.

    [34] Adedoyin, interview.

    [35] Cusick, Surfing for God, 69.

    [36] Cusick, Surfing for God, 69.

    [37] Ibid., 9.

    [38] Cusick, Surfing for God, 71

    [39] Lovvorn, interview.

    [40] Andrew Comiskey, Strength in Weakness: Healing Sexual and Relational Brokenness (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2003), 69.

    [41] Lovvorn, interview.

    [42] Although accountability is inherent within the process, Lovvorn’s emphasis was on community. I don’t remember a specific discussion about accountability, which seems to be the primary emphasis elsewhere.

    [43] Monica Lewinsky, “The Price of Shame,” accessed November 2018, https://www.ted.com/talks/monica_lewinsky_the_price_of_shame?language=en.

    [44] It is more of a side note to point out that many people say that you can’t talk about sex in SH cultures. While it’s true that a missionary or national Christian in Nigeria should exercise caution when dealing with the issue, they should never use the logic that “they don’t talk about it here” as an excuse to avoid engagement. Just one of many reasons for this can be illustrated by the following comment from Adedoyin: “They don’t talk about sexual issues in the church or even for people who are getting married. So people use pornography as an excuse to learn.”

    [45] Brené Brown, Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parents, and Lead (New York: Gotham, 2012), 59.

    [46] Zeba A. Crook, Reconceptualizing Conversion: Patronage, Loyalty, and Conversion in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004), 45.

    [47] Jayson Georges and Mark D. Baker. Ministering in Honor-Shame Cultures: Biblical Foundations and Practical Essentials (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016), 209.

  • Bible Storying and the Affective Domain

    Bible Storying and the Affective Domain

     Mark, a Chinese man, came up to me after the story of Simon and the sinful woman smiling and shaking his head in amazement.  Referencing the previous stories about Jesus as well, he said, “Every time time these stories start, I wonder how Jesus is going to handle this situation.”  He cocked his head and smiled again, then added, “And He always does what is best and most wise!”

         I’ve had several good conversations with Mark in our English / Bible storying class at church. He’s genuinely inquisitive and has a good general disposition. The teachings about Jesus are very new to him and so his reactions aren’t the same as your typical person who has grown up in church.  When Jesus says “love your enemies,” the radical nature of the teaching can be seen in Mark and on the other incredulous faces in the room.

         Much has been written about the importance of Bible storying, so I’m not doing anything radical in the world of missions by focusing on telling the stories of the Bible to the internationals.  However, I want to look at this through what may be a unique lens.

         Paul Hiebert, the great Christian cultural anthropologist, taught us to see three different aspects of culture:  the cognitive, the affective, and the evaluative.  When sharing truth, Westerners tend to focus primarily on the cognitive (conceptual information) and then end with the evaluative (making decisions based on what is valued). However, we often miss the affective – that part of culture which describes the emotional side of truth. Emotions can be both a result of a truth and they can also be used to lead towards deciding that something is true.

         When we share the gospel in terms of the cognitive only, it usually comes out in a form similar to the “four spiritual laws.”  These are good and true, of course. It’s true that God loves us and wants what is best. It’s also true that we are sinners, that Christ died for us, and that we should yield our lives to Him. However, all of this can be understood as simply conceptual information. People are given a cognitive outline of what Jesus did and how it’s supposed to help them, but they don’t really know who this Jesus is.

         Consider for just a moment the Great Commandment. The GREATEST commandment, that is.  “And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.” (Mark 12:30, ESV) If we genuinely seek to see this become a reality in those to whom we are sharing the gospel, then two questions should jump out to us:

    1. Does a purely cognitive-based approach to sharing the gospel produce love towards God?  
    2. If not, then can you be genuinely converted to Christ on the basis of the cognitive alone?  

         To be sure, to love Christ is to obey Him, not just to have an emotional attachment to Him. But as is the case in marriage, a commitment towards certain actions without any emotional attachment signals that there is something wrong. There will surely be disastrous relational consequences in a marriage where a man has no affection towards his wife.  

         To use another example, when we eulogize people at funerals, we typically include more than cognitive information. Imagine a funeral where these are the only things that were said:

    • “He was responsible at work.”
    • “His office was really clean.”
    • “He helped land the contract to build the Citibank building.”
    • “He was an efficient leader.”  

    These things are well and good and and appropriate for funerals. But left alone they are radically incomplete, aren’t they? Even soldiers who died in battle for the freedom of others are not remembered for their sacrifice only. Those that love the soldier normally want us to know more about him. This is why we include stories! Funny stories. Touching stories. Stories such as:

    • The time he laughed so hard he fell off the top bunk just as the sergeant entered the room
    • The time he protected his little brother from the bully in elementary school
    • The time he asked his wife to marry him and uncharacteristically cried for fifteen minutes straight when she said “yes.”  

         Why do we include these types of stories?

         It’s the difference between giving information about someone and telling people what they were like.

         I’m certainly not going to say that all of those who prayed to accept Christ after being presented the four spiritual laws aren’t actually saved or that they had no love for God at the time they prayed to accept Him. The Holy Spirit is not shackled by our limitations.  

         However, I can clearly say that Hiebert was right. We can’t ignore the affective domain. In addition to telling people “about” Jesus, we must tell them who He is and what He is like.  If our goal is for people to love Jesus, we must tell the stories. After all, these are some great stories!  

         To my knowledge, Mark has not trusted Christ as his Lord and Savior. However, after a few months of attending our English / Bible storying class, he is beginning to love Jesus. And that’s’ a great place to start.  

  • African-Americans, Missions, and a Chinese Teenager

    African-Americans, Missions, and a Chinese Teenager

    This article was originally published by Evangelical Missions Quarterly July 1, 2016

    African-American Christians have a significant role in the global spread of the gospel for many reasons.  One unique contribution was clearly illustrated as I was leading a few seminary students on a trip to a Southeast Asian country where I had previously lived. While we were there, I witnessed one of my students accomplish something in six minutes that I didn’t accomplish in six years.  

    Jessie was simply walking across the field to get in position for the next pull in our game of ultimate frisbee with the local youth ministry.  That’s when Wilson, a Chinese teenager, made a statement that completely shocked him.  If it had been said in an American night club, the music would have ceased with a loud awkward squeak, the waitresses would have dropped their trays full of glass-bottled drinks, and everyone would have been trying to decide whether to stare or just pretend they didn’t hear it.  

    Jessie and Jocelyn taking on the “durian challenge” while on a break from ultimate frisbee. Like most Americans, Jocelyn wasn’t wild about the pungent Southeast Asian fruit.

    “I think it’s great that you’re from the U.S.  That means that you have the equivalence of a white man.” 

    As Jessie McAlpine, an African-American student at Beeson, was trying to process the statement he had just heard, the teen went on to explain that he, too, shared in the white man’s credentials because of the length of time he had spent in Australia. 

    Keep in mind that, when Jessie repeated this first sentence from Wilson (not his real name), I had never experienced this particular encounter between an African-American and a Chinese youth.  Yet I immediately knew how the rest of the story was going to play out. 

    And it made this white man very happy.  Let me explain.   

    PREPARATION FOR THE FIELD

    As I prepared for missions, there had been a great deal of discussion in my seminary courses about the challenges of building up national leadership in many parts of the non-Western world.  The majority of the modern missions movement was undertaken in the context of Western nations colonizing non-Western peoples and even carving out the current geo-political boundaries.  Superiority in technology, military strength, and education led towards the assumption of both the Westerner and national alike that the white man was, in fact, superior.  What followed was a stifling reluctance (again on both sides) for emerging national churches to produce leaders for themselves.  Long-term dependence on Western funds and leadership virtually eliminated the potential for churches to multiply and severely limited the reach of the Gospel.

    While a great deal has changed in the last few decades, much of the old mindset remains.  The West is still more dominant in many of these same spheres than most nations that will receive missionaries.  There are also new challenges resulting from globalism.  Exposure to the rest of the world through media has only contributed to an inferiority complex – especially among the young. 

    One of the clearest descriptions I have read about the emergence and subsequent effects of an encroaching global youth culture is from a chapter of a secular book entitled Youth Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.  In this chapter Mark Leichty details the dramatic shift that occurred in Kathmandu when the country of Nepal, which had long been closed to all outside influences, suddenly opened up to the rest of the world.  He writes about a teenager named Ramesh, who had been in and out of drug addiction, and details the influence that had come from movies, novels, and magazines.  While the night life in Tokyo interested him, it was the stories of gang life in the Bronx that fascinated him most.  Liechty explains, “Ironically, it seemed sometimes as though Ramesh already lived in New York.  ‘The Bronx’ in particular seemed to be a kind of shadow universe where his mind roamed while his body navigated the streets of Kathmandu.”[1]  Ramesh consistently used what Liechty calls an “external self-referent” to describe Nepal – “out here in Kathmandu.”  Using the phrase “out here” to refer to your own country is simply impossible outside of the reality created by global media.  In the constant between Nepal and America, Nepal always seemed inferior. 

    Ramesh summed up the situation with the following:  “You know, now I know soooo much. [pause]  Being a frog in a pond isn’t a bad life, but being a frog in an ocean is like Hell.”[2]

    Indeed, a great deal of people today are growing peering through the lens of movies and music into worlds that are presented as far superior to their own.  When their eyes avert from the screens of their TVs, computers, and movie screens, and into the reality in which they live, they often feel as if they are “out here in Kathmandu.”  Or Indonesia, Uganda, Paraguay, etc. 

    MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE

    The country where my family and I lived for six years is the same Southeast Asian country where Jessie had his encounter on the frisbee field.  Jessie and I were there in January of this year for only two weeks as a part of his cross-cultural ministry practicum for Beeson Divinity School, where I serve as the Director of the Global Center.  In 2006 I had started an ultimate frisbee team in a different city as a means to meet students, both national and international.  The weekly time of frisbee became, for me, a foundational source of relationships that eventually paved the way for a full-blown student ministry. 

    It became apparent for me early on that my status as a white man and an American greatly helped my ability to coach this team. (On a side note, tennis is my real sport.  The only experience I had with ultimate frisbee was through playing informally with friends.)  It seemed that they listened to me in an unquestioning way that wasn’t necessarily merited.  While the latter statement is partly from observation, I was also specifically told several times, “It’s a good thing you’re an American.  It will be easier to start the team.”  While I had taken active steps to establish leadership among the students (and a couple of graduates) for the purpose of eventually giving over all of my leadership to them, it didn’t quite work out that way.  When the time came for me to step down, they chose a European to coach them.  

    In the local student ministry it was paramount for me that we train students to lead in the ministry.  We were able to, in fact, train up a core group of students to take ownership of several key roles.  However, it was definitely more of a struggle than I had experienced in the States.  There was also a period of time where another American leader (Candis, who was finishing a two-year term) and I had intentionally prepared the students for her exit from the country.  For months we reminded them that she was leaving and trained them for the specific leadership roles they would need to fill in her absence.  Then the time came. 

    Candis went home.  They dropped the ball.  The student ministry suffered.   

    A short summary of other observations from the field are as follows:

    • While many churches had established local leadership, church planting was still seen by most of them as a job for Americans. 
    • American speakers were always a bigger draw than local speakers.
    • While it was my great desire to train up national youth leaders for local churches, the only vision many local leaders had for their youth ministries was to try to recruit an American to come and serve for a year or two.  Little did these Americans know that their very presence was reinforcing a reluctance among nationals to take ownership of a task that they should have seen as theirs.
    • A bright spot for national leadership was found among a core group of youth ministers I taught at a seminary.  After receiving consistent encouragement from myself and other trainers from Youth Ministry International, they stepped up and began training other national youth workers without any input or oversight from me.  Having said that, one of the consistent themes discussed in our courses, as they were being prepared for ministry to youth, was the issue of self-image among their students. 

    BACK TO THE STORY

    So how did Jessie react?  Probably exactly how you think he reacted. 

    It wasn’t the response a seminary student, having recently studied the importance of the doctrine of eternal security, gives to a young Christian who is worried that she may lose her salvation.  There was no attempt to remember an outline of a recent Bible study or struggle to recall a nugget of truth written in a book on which he had recently been tested.

    No, this was a visceral reaction.  It’s the response of a man who has spent his entire life reminding himself, and being reminded by his African-American community, to not let others look down on him because of his ethnicity.  It’s the reaction of someone who can understand the “mystery” that Paul talked about – that the Gentiles are now included by faith into the family of God – more intuitively than a white American Christian who has always taken it for granted that God loves his people as much as anyone else.

     “Let me explain something to you. I’m proud to be black and you should be just as proud to be Chinese.”

     “Your self-worth has no bearing on whether or not you’re ‘associated’ with white men.” And neither does mine.”

    “I’m black because God made me that way; and there is absolutely nothing wrong with the way that God made me. You’re Chinese because God made you that way; and there is absolutely nothing wrong with the way that God made you!”

    “You’re created in the image of God. Embrace who you are!”

    THE DIFFERENCE

    When Jessie told me about the conversation, these truths above seemed as fragrant, tangible, and meaningful as I had ever experienced them.  You see, I had repeated them often during my years of ministry in this country.  However, I was always aware that, even if they didn’t say this out loud (which they did occasionally), they were at least thinking it. 

    “Easy for you to say.  You’re white.”  

    This time, of course, it was different.  How can you know the first thing about the history of African-Americans (I’ve found that many people around the globe understand the basics) and excuse yourself by saying, “That’s easy for you to say”?

    It had never occurred to me until the clarity of the encounter of Jessie and Wilson the enormity of influence the African-American church could have in building up indigenous leadership in other parts of the world.  There are many positives that can result.  I’ll focus on two.

    Identity and self-image.  In virtually every country in the world there are minority people groups who are looked down upon by the majority and suffer from discrimination.  One of the most extreme examples would be the Dalits in India.  How encouraging would it be for these people, many of whom are living in a type of bond slavery, to hear testimonies from African-American Christians who can tell of how God saved them individually and how their people have gone from being slaves to being able to travel the world?  I don’t know this for sure, but I can’t help but to believe that it would make the truth of our adoption as sons and daughters (Ephesians 1:5) become more believable among Christians from minority peoples across the globe.  As much as they may struggle with it, they are less likely to respond with, “That’s easy for you to say.” 

    Non-dependence.  While national churches in non-Western countries are often trapped in an unhealthy pattern of dependence on Western money and leadership, the African-American church can serve as a great example to them.  Sure, there are a great deal of social ministries in African-American communities run by white people, but the churches have been fiercely independent for quite some time.   To illustrate the point, here are some things you will never hear an African-American say to a white person – even a Christian whom they know is genuinely trying to help: 

    • “They’ll follow you better than they will follow one of us.”
    • “We have leaders for our local churches, but we need white people to start new churches.” 
    • “White men are just better preachers than us.”  (Admit it.  This one made you laugh.)

    I don’t know what the future holds for the African-American church and its

    role in what God is doing among the peoples of the earth.  There seems to be a growing consciousness, however, that it is time for their participation in the Great Commission to increase.  I, for one, am hopeful that this will happen.  Such a movement could serve to the global body of Christ as a fresh reminder of God’s glorious Gospel which is for every tongue, tribe, and nation.  


    [1] Vered Amit-Talai and Helena Wulff, Youth Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.  London: Routledge, 1995, 186. 

    [2] Ibid., 187.

  • Christmas: Joy, Depression, and the New Creation

    Christmas: Joy, Depression, and the New Creation

    I have long understood that the Christmas season, so full of joy and hope, also so full of depression and despair, represented in our culture a sort of hope of Heaven. We speak of joy and celebrate life together and, indeed, we often experience joy during this season. We also portray a collective vision of life and relationships that is well beyond the reality most people experience, thus leading to bouts of depression over broken relationships or the pain of remembering the loved ones who have passed on and are unable to celebrate with us.

    So Christmas serves in our culture as a metaphor for Heaven, eliciting happiness or despair and most often a mix of both. For the believer, there is ultimately hope as they face the world’s brokenness and “set their hope on the grace to be given them on the day of Christ Jesus.” (1 Peter 1:13)

    What I don’t think I ever realized is just how biblical this is. As I’m going through an Advent reading plan, it suddenly struck me that the Old Testament passages we read which point us towards the coming of Jesus are inextricably mingled with prophecies of the end times. Commentaries are full of helpful explanations to guide us to understand which prophecies are talking about his birth and which are talking about his return in the last days. Of course, this wouldn’t be necessary if it were not so difficult to keep it straight in our heads as we are reading it. The coming of the Messiah, as great as it was and is, simply isn’t complete until he returns to eradicate sin and make all things new.

    Therefore, our reflection on the birth of Christ rightly produces both true joy and deep unfulfilled longing at the same time. We rejoice that the prophets were correct when speaking of the coming of Jesus. On this side of history we can celebrate the salvation that even we Gentiles experience in the here and now through the grace Jesus purchased on the cross. We also have the joy of knowing we will be with God forever on a new Earth that will be infinitely more beautiful than any Norman Rockwell or Thomas Kinkade painting would lead us to imagine. And yet this is no reason to strip away all of the experiences that fall short of the reality. On the contrary, we should embrace the imperfect visualizations of a perfect world, knowing full well that, as we wrap our arms around it, there may be thorns on the other side. As we do this, we should remember the great hope that Jesus has brought into the world and into our lives, in particular. We should also remember that our citizenship lies elsewhere, in a perfect kingdom which will be consummated only with our Lord’s return.

    Dec. 1, 2017

  • Missiological Fiction

    Missiological Fiction

    My conversation with Jennifer Rash, Editor-in-Chief of The Alabama Baptist and The Baptist Paper, about missiological fiction

    If you’re wanting a lighter explanation of the idea of “missiological fiction,” I recommend the video above. If, however, you’re interested in a deeper dive into the academic discipline of missiology, please read the paper below. It was accepted for presentation at the Evangelical Missiological Society national conference in Dallas in 2023.

    SPOILER ALERT! If you haven’t read the novel, there are a few things in the paper that will reveal major plot lines.

    EMPLOYING THE APOSTOLIC IMAGINATION TO TEACH MISSIONS THROUGH MISSIOLOGICAL FICTION

    This paper will explore the potential of fiction to teach missions. In a similar way that the Bible storying approach impacts oral peoples around the world, creative stories illustrating the beauty of the gospel advancing across cultures can teach missiological content. Such stories can uniquely connect with some people in a way other teaching styles do not. In addition to the potential advantages of this approach, disadvantages and potential pitfalls will also be discussed.

          My personal journey leading me to blend the worlds of missiology and fiction began with my then fourteen-year-old daughter embarking on a full-length novel. Impressed with her diligence and creativity, I decided I would try to write something myself as a way to join her. Deciding on a missions theme was obvious, but early into the process I realized the unique advantages of using fiction to illustrate truths I had been teaching in my class for years. I’ll discuss my recently published novel, Arman’s Freedom, throughout this paper. As I do so, keep in mind that it’s more than just a shameless plug for my book, but the current list of books of which I’m aware that fit this genre can be counted on one hand.

          What is missiological fiction? There’s no agreed upon definition, therefore I will offer my own. A work of missiological fiction is a story illustrating truths typically taught in a Christian missions class. My personal interest is to help the reader understand other religious worldviews and to be challenged by seeing how the gospel translates into cultures throughout the world. Because this is a conference considering how to teach missions, I should add that the approach I’m suggesting is to have students read the book, then reference the story to illustrate the missiological truths covered in class. While I’m employing missiology throughout this paper, this is more about a proposal of ideas rather than presenting factual research (although anecdotal feedback will be referenced) since so little has been done in this area. More specifically, the ideas I am proposing ultimately lead to the greater objective of encouraging the development of a new genre in literature.

    Concerns and Pitfalls

          There are multiple concerns which could be raised about the prospect of a new genre of missiological fiction. First of all, there’s the potential for it to just become bad Christian entertainment. A story which fails to capture the attention and imagination of the reader will never accomplish its underlying purpose. Another pitfall is the potential for heresy and/or just poor theology in general. The Shack and Left Behind come to mind for me. Others may point to how This Present Darkness was instrumental in giving shape to the theology and practice of the Third Wave movement in dealing with spiritual warfare. Regardless of your opinion about these works, we should be hesitant to throw out a method because it has been used poorly. If that were the case, we would have to give up on preaching and teaching as well. The reality is that these books made an indelible impression on people who were not as likely to read a non-fiction theological work.

          My greatest concern in proposing a genre of missiological fiction isn’t any of the above. Instead, it’s subtly forgetting to use the Bible as the primary tool to teach missions. Missions professors already have a reputation for being overly dependent on stories, so the temptation to rely on a compelling novel seems realistic. Once again, however, the answer is not to throw a good method out, but to keep it in its proper place.

    The Affective Domain

                Andrew Peterson, Christian musician and novelist, often says, “If you want someone to know the truth, tell them. If you want someone to love the truth, tell them a story.”[1] While he is not a missiologist, Peterson is getting to the heart of what missionary anthropologist Paul Hiebert calls the “affective domain” of cultures.

          One of Hiebert’s motivations in teaching what he called the “three domains of culture,” was to open the eyes of western missionaries who had been impacted more by Enlightenment Rationalism than they realized. They typically understood the cognitive aspects of a culture, which pointed to the rational content of what cultures consciously believed and taught. However, they would often either dismiss or misunderstand the affective domain of culture. This is where the emotions of a given people come into play through art, story, music, or any teaching that is designed to reach the heart. Hiebert argued that the evaluative domain of a culture – how they make decisions – is informed by both the cognitive and affective domains.

    Cross-cultural communicators often overlook the importance of this affective dimension in the lives of ordinary people. Leaders stress the preaching of cognitive truth in church services, and downplay the importance of feelings in worship… People often leave the church with their heads full and their hearts empty. Most people make decisions on the basis of emotions and experience as much as on rational argument. On the other hand, stressing affectivity alone leaves people with their hearts full and their heads empty. Both cognition and affectivity are vital to religious life.[2]

          In a recent presentation on culture at Beeson Divinity School, Gavin Ortlund offered the following observation: “Twenty years ago, the main question was ‘Is the gospel true?’ Today the question is, ‘Is the gospel good?’”[3] The former question answers the concerns of modernism. The latter question is born out of the objections of postmodernism. In a day and age where we are taught to be repulsed by the idea of trying to “convert” someone, especially other religious adherents, perhaps it be more impactful on a young Christian to provide a picture of how the gospel translates into a young Muslim’s life that strikes them as both good and beautiful. Instead of simply drawing up the math through rational biblical arguments as to why all people need Jesus, what if we immerse them into the mind and emotions of a sympathetic character who obviously needs the gospel of grace? Have missiologists taught students to employ the affective domain among unreached people groups and yet reduced its use in their own classroom to personal testimonies? I believe missions professors have room to learn from our own teaching.

    Complexity and Clarity

          Another advantage of well-told stories, relating to the affective domain, is that they can illustrate the complexity of truth to those who have dismissed a situation as black and white. Eudora Welty, who wrote short stories and novels about the American South, said that “a plot is a thousand times more unsettling than an argument, which may be answered.”[4]

          For example, it’s one thing to make an argument about how the church should view and implement the Bible’s teaching of the Kingdom of God. It’s altogether different, however, to weave together a story of a church which exists for its own self-preservation coming face to face with a Muslim background believer who risked everything for the sake of Christ, even to the extent that he witnessed the murder of his own sister. This is one of the storylines from Jeff Christopherson’s novel, “Once You See: The Seven Temptations of the Western Church.” Christopherson, Executive Director for the Canadian Baptist Convention and Church Planting Canada, said the genesis of this book happened after he had started a church planting network and subsequently watched, year after year, as church planters with the best resources continued to come to an end of themselves. They were succumbing to common temptations, as seen in the title of the book, ranging from a dependence on attracting people through an excellent presentation of music and worship, a trust in staff which centered on talent, to a syncretism with politics. In a personal interview with Christopherson, he offered the following thoughts and observations:

    We keep writing books on the same things and nothing changes. Why do we keep having the same conversations? People have been discipled to think what they think. Their version of mission is what they’ve seen and grown up with. You can’t compete and win with theological and philosophical kinds of arguments. You have to appeal to both the heart and mind. You have to write something where people see and emotionally feel.”[5]

          The book is still new, but Christopherson has said that, compared to his other books, there is “no question that the reactions to this book are a lot stronger.”[6] The latter statement was from an interview in March. In an early October interview, Christopherson said that churches are buying the book in quantities and using it to train leadership teams. At a gathering in Vancouver last month, Cru gathered leaders from various ministries, including Focus on the Family and Alpha Canada, and organized breakout sessions around the seven temptations of the church described in “Once You See.” The week before that, he was in Philadelphia, where the Baptist Convention was employing the book for their annual convention. The hope is that the readers will be challenged in their thinking in a way that illustrates complexity where they had seen simplicity and, at the same time, brings clarity to the purposes of God.

          In my own work, Arman’s Freedom, I use a person the reader comes to know and empathize with to illustrate the complexity of an individual’s worldview and to bring clarity to these global realities at the same time.[7] For many years now, I’ve attempted to teach students that most people in the world do not fit neatly within the religious label they claim.[8] Most people are a mix of competing worldviews, including monotheism, animism, modernism, and postmodernism. I’ve also proposed the theory that most people have a “first worldview” similar to how most multi-linguists have a “first language.” This is their default set of beliefs which they use to make sense of the world whenever possible. They pull from other worldviews, I argue, when their first worldview fails to adequately address a specific problem.

          A couple of years ago, I developed a visual model to help students further grasp this idea beyond the abstract explanation, but it still lacked something. I’m convinced the void was filled through fiction. In Arman’s Freedom, the protagonist is a young Iranian man who moves to Malaysia to pursue an education in journalism hoping to eventually escape Iran permanently. As the story progresses, it becomes clear he has various competing worldviews which significantly influence his thinking. On the one hand, he hasn’t rejected his belief in God. He’s only rejected the version of Allah pushed down his throat by the Iranian “Government of God.” His continual feelings of guilt and shame, coupled by his fear of punishment illustrate that God is still a reality for him.

          On the other hand, there is a deep desire to cling to a vague idea of God preventing him from being confused as a terrorist. From the pluralistic writings of the ancient Persian poet, Rumi, to today’s “coexist” axiom, the reader can discern that his primary worldview may be postmodernism. His love of democracy and truth in journalism, among other things, illustrate that modernism is also tugging on his heart.

          As I am taught the worldview section of my class, Introduction to Christian Missions, this past Spring, I was able to refer to Arman and his various life experiences to connect the concepts into my students’ hearts and minds. The conversation became more personal because they felt like Arman was someone they knew. “I found myself praying for Arman,” said one of my students. By using the ability of story to clarify the complex, while also appealing to the affective domain, my students will more likely be able to remember the worldview lessons than if I taught another way. The results of an anonymous survey about Arman’s Freedom, though it was just one class, were encouraging. One student wrote, “Having this book is a nice change of pace from our normal non-fiction readings. I loved discussing it in class in connection with related principles from the worldview discussion.” Other students both agreed and also made it clear that the lessons in the book weren’t clear until I began using it as a reference in class.

          Perhaps the potential effectiveness of missiological stories shouldn’t surprise us since our Master Teacher employed parables to accomplish similar goals. “The Kingdom of Heaven is like” precedes enough of the parables to let the hearer know that this is a major point behind most of what he is teaching. When the disciples asked why he taught in parables, “he answered them, ‘To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven’” (Matthew 13:11). Stories such as the Prodigal Son, for example, tell us more about God’s kingdom than what could be accomplished through a rational argument. It would have been easy for the listener to simply agree with the Pharisees, some of whom were undoubtedly present as Jesus introduced the parable, when they insisted that sinners deserve punishment. While this is true, Jesus personalizes the abstract with a rebellious son and a father who welcomes him back with lavish displays of affection. The hearers have now been “unsettled,” as Eudora Welty put so well, by a plot that not only carries the aroma of the Kingdom of Heaven, but also forces them to see themselves as either the prodigal or the older brother. They are no longer hearing an argument. They are in a story.

    Contextualization

          Stories can also be an effective means to provide an effective background upon which to place the conceptual principles of contextualization. The teaching of contextualization must be rooted in Scripture in such a way that students are convinced both of the Bible’s relevance to all people and that the Bible itself teaches us to consider culture as we are communicating the gospel. Most leaders who teach missions will also use case studies from the past and present to further help students learn their own cultural biases as they try to apply truth to a different context. These practices, together with insights from applied anthropology, form the basis for biblical contextualization. Below, I will consider how missiological fiction can complement – not replace – these practices by providing examples from Arman’s Freedom. While this focus on contextualization is a distinct section of my paper, I’m not leaving the impact of the affective domain. I believe that encountering these principles in the context of a character you love, who is in a situation that is heavily “unsettling,” will help students remember them. 

    Redemptive Analogies

          Missionaries faced with the task of explaining the gospel to people in radically different contexts have often found bridges embedded within the culture itself. Don Richardson became known for the book, Peace Child, in which he recounts being a missionary in New Guinea wrestling with how to share the gospel with tribes who are perpetually at war. Eventually he discovered a practice where two tribes would give one of their children to the other tribe to be raised as one of their own. In such a scenario, it would guarantee that neither tribe would be likely to attack the other. Richardson then used this practice as a means to contextualize the gospel message, saying that God has given us his Son as a “peace child.”[9] In later years, Richardson popularized the term “redemptive analogy” and wrote about how such comparisons are used throughout Scripture, including Paul’s employment of the “altar to the unknown God.”[10] While all analogies break down at some point, there are often practices and stories within other cultures that can be used to point to the gospel.

          Missiological fiction provides the opportunity to explore redemptive analogies in a unique way. This became clear to me as I discovered something related to Chaharshenbeh Suri, the Iranian practice of jumping over fire during the annual Nowruz (New Year) festival. During the festival has ancient roots related to Zoroastrianism, there is a song that is sung or chanted before the jump, while looking at the fire. This song has clear redemptive qualities.

          “Take my sickly yellow pallor (or, pastiness). Give me your rosy glow.”

          This expressive desire for new life became the central metaphor for communicating the gospel in Arman’s Freedom. As a fan of The Chronicles of Narnia, I wanted to use Chaharshenbeh Suri to appeal to those who, like me, enjoy Christian fiction. I connected the “rosy glow” metaphor, therefore, with C.S. Lewis’s famous story of Eustace Scrubbs, whose selfishness and greed turned him into a dragon. In his misery and shame, Eustace tried to use his claws to tear off the dragon skin, but all he managed to do was cause himself a great deal of pain and depression. When Aslan tears into him, however, it’s worse at first, but soon the pain gives way to joy as Eustace realizes he’s been turned back into a boy.[11] This well-known and beloved story is a beautiful illustration of how we cannot save ourselves through our own effort nor do we accomplish sanctification by works, but all are in need of the saving grace of Jesus.

          In my novel, Arman is plagued by scars which he earned through foolish behavior while jumping over fire the year before in Iran. His actions, which he understands to be sinful, had substantial consequences for both he and his family, causing them all to live with deep shame. For many months, Arman had been hiding his three scars while desperately hoping they would heal on their own. His wounds, and his inability to make them heal, serve as a constant reminder of his sin.

          While in a dream, Atrin, who represents Jesus, tells him to jump over a fire (You would need to read the book to understand why). Before doing so, Arman realizes that the ancient chant of “Take my sickly yellow pallor. Give me your rosy glow” feels more like a prayer. Taking the leap, time slows to an impossible crawl. At first he is visually reminded of his sins and assumes that he is about to be eternally judged. Then something very different happens.

    A flame shot out of the fire like orange lightning. It entered into the scar on Arman’s ankle, shot up his left leg, through his torso, and into the wound on his chest, which was now emanating a dark yellowish glow. It flew out of his chest and slammed into his face, knocking his head backward. It coursed through his flesh and bones with an immobilizing force, drawing the very air out of his lungs. And yet, he began to understand that this was not a hopeless pain. It was more like a doctor wrenching a dislocated shoulder into place.[12]

          It is my hope that this parable connects with lovers of fiction in a way that both makes the gospel beautiful and helps them see how to find redemptive analogies in other cultures, such as those heavily governed by shame and honor, in order to make the gospel known.

    Shame/Honor Gospel

          One of the most rewarding sections of my missions class is teaching about shame/honor (SH) cultures and how to understand the gospel through a different lens. It’s a challenging task considering the fact that we in the West are primarily used to understanding the message of Jesus through a guilt/innocence (GI) approach only. My own journey in growing to appreciate the breadth of SH in the Scriptures began with a degree in missions and progressed with life and ministry in Southeast Asia. Even after moving back to Birmingham, teaching missions, and years of working with adult Chinese students in a Bible study, the SH gospel was like feeling around the fuzzy edges of an amoeba in the dark and trying to explain what was in my hands.

          The basic methods I’ve used to teach SH gospel begin with an introduction to Jayson George’s 3D Gospel, a video entitled “Back to God’s Village,”[13] followed by looking into Scripture to see what is clearly there, but is sometimes invisible to us. The conversations have been beneficial, but I never know how much is going to stick. After all, I know how long it’s taken me to appreciate the beauty of what the Bible has to say about shame and honor. With that in mind, one of my main goals with Arman’s Freedom was to illustrate these stunning realities.

          The story begins with a young Iranian desiring to get a journalism degree in Malaysia then move to the West following graduation. He desires both freedom and the respect of those who share his similar values toward democracy and religion. One of his greatest fears is to be associated with Islamic extremism or anything related to the oppressive “Government of God” in his home country. His embrace of religious pluralism is one way of distancing himself from the people and institutions he hates. His worst nightmare comes true, however, when his cousin is involved in a terrorist plot to blow up the Petronas Towers. Arman, guilty by association, becomes the most wanted man on the planet. To make matters worse, a moment is captured on video of Arman in his white shirt, in the midst of the collapsing building, making a split-second decision to save his own life instead of the life of a child. Fortunately for the child, a man in a green shirt became a hero when he grasped the baby stroller just in time. As for Arman, the label of “coward” is piled upon the other accusations of being a murderer. While on the run, he must grapple with the new reality that, not only is he considered a reject by his own government, but now he is despised by the Iranians and global citizens whose opinions he holds dear. In addition to his own horrible predicament, Arman is also paralyzed by the thought of the shame inflicted upon his parents, knowing full well that their lives have been destroyed.

          Speaking of his parents, Arman already carried deep shame because of sinful actions committed during Chaharshenbeh Suri while still in Iran. The scars don’t remind him of the cost to himself only, but the shame and financial ruin inflicted on his parents as well. Western novels and movies do not linger on consequences faced by parents of the protagonist, so this storyline is striking. The relational consequences with Arman’s parents and the world are tangible realities throughout. Even before Arman is imprisoned, his intense loneliness is always present.

          Eventually Arman is captured, not by the police, but by the actual terrorists themselves. Placed in a pitch black cell, Arman encounters another prisoner named Atrin, who we eventually come to know is Jesus. Atrin earns Arman’s respect, first by listening with empathy, then by revealing supernatural knowledge of Arman’s struggles and sin. In a conversation on the theme of freedom, Atrin points out the fact that Arman could be released from jail, allowed immediate entry into any country of choice, but would never be free from the sting of shame that hangs over his reputation. Almost everyone will still believe he’s a terrorist, not to mention that they have all seen the video of him clinging to his own life instead of helping the child. He can never be free.

          As gunfire erupts outside of the prison, Atrin tells Arman to grab the shirt he had taken off due to the heat and follow him. After Atrin points Arman toward the staircase that will lead him out of the dungeon, he does something that is completely inexplicable. Atrin willingly gives himself up. With no time to dwell on it, Arman continues to sprint until he is miles away from his former captors. He enters a mostly empty restaurant in the middle of the night and sees a news report that the suspected terrorist had given himself up and reveals that it was not Arman whom they were seeking after all. Atrin had fully confessed both to complicity in the terrorist plot and to being the one in the white shirt who had clung to his own life instead of saving the child. The authorities were still looking for Arman, but not to punish him. Rather, they want to thank him for being the hero who saved the child’s life from the crumbling tower.

          Arman eventually looks down in disbelief only to realize that he was wearing the same green shirt as the hero who saved the child. Atrin had intentionally switched shirts with him and taken on all of his shame. This did not simply have the effect of erasing the negative consequences of jail. It provided him with a new identity that both restored and greatly improved his relationship with the people whom he loved. It also had the effect of Atrin’s father now being covered in the shame of his son. It’s a gift that is so stunning, confusing and seemingly unfair that Arman almost immediately questions how he could possibly accept it.

          Such is the beauty of the gospel, as illustrated in the parable of the Prodigal Son. The son shames the father in ways that are almost unimaginable in their culture. He comes back only to ask if he could be a servant. The father eschews the cultural expectations that he would expel the shame by rejecting the son. Instead, he willingly takes on the shame by running to the son and embracing him. Instead of simply being forgiven, he is brought a robe, a ring for his finger, and is thrown a party designed to both welcome him back and restore his identity as the honored son in the sight of the community.

          Through a purely GI lens, the gospel can only be understood as God releasing us from the penalty of our actions. The SH lens illustrates both an additional aspect of our sin – the shaming of our Heavenly Father – and the extraordinary gift of honor in being his forgiven and beloved children. The honor goes beyond our individual feelings. Our new status is both a present and future reality in the sight of fellow princes and princesses.

          We often teach righteousness as Jesus exchanging our sinful and dirty shirt for a perfectly spotless one. This is helpful to understand how we are cleansed of our sin, but the full reality is much greater, as illustrated by Arman’s new green shirt. We aren’t simply released from what we have done. We get credit for what Jesus has done to fulfill the righteous requirements of the law. Jayson Georges, author of 3D Gospel: Ministry in Guilt, Shame, and Fear Cultures, writes, “God exchanges our old status as unclean, worthless, and inferior outcasts for the status of pure, worthy, and honorable children. Those who follow Christ to the cross of shame will also follow him into resurrection glory.”[14]

          As I used Arman’s Freedom in class to explain these truths, I saw the lights switch on as they offered their own relevant thoughts, both from the novel and from Scripture. It is my hope that these lessons will remain more deeply ingrained in the hearts and minds of my students as the result of employing the affective domain through an extended parable.

    HISTORICAL FICTION

          Missiological fiction also wields the potential to help us understand global Christianity. Much has been made of the belief that the fastest growing church in the world is inside Iran.[15] My own experience in Malaysia is that they were the most open people group to the gospel of anyone I encountered. The first response of a Christian to such an explosion of the gospel should be thankfulness to God. A missiological response is to also ask, “Why are they so open?”[16] I already had a general idea, but as I studied the history of Iran since the Revolution in 1979, it became clear that there were unique factors that could be effectively taught through the use of historical fiction.

          In contrast with non-fiction history, the novelist has the advantage of taking the most significant and remarkable historical events to use as a storyline which places the main characters directly inside them. By doing so, Arman’s Freedom is able to both explain why Iranians are open, not only to the gospel, but to other non-Islamic worldviews as well. In addition, a depiction of life for Christians inside Iran is also provided.

    THE APOSTOLIC IMAGINATION FOR THE FUTURE OF FICTION

          I’ve used examples only from Once You See and Arman’s Freedom because that’s close to all that I’m aware of that fits the category of what I envision as “missiological fiction.” In conclusion, I’d like to employ the apostolic imagination to offer a few ideas of what this could look like in the future.

          When it comes to theologically informed fiction, fewer writers are more influential among seminarians than Wendell Berry. Jayber Crow, for example, is an extraordinarily thoughtful narrative which critiques how modern ways of farming exploited the land and made it difficult for farmers to make a living in a way that also contributed to healthy relationships in society.[17] Old Testament professor Paul House, while showing his appreciation for Berry, writes, “I’m glad we have writers who can help us know when we unwittingly mimic unbiblical patterns.”[18]

          While I also appreciate Berry’s writings and some of his famous quotes, I’m also mindful that no one will read Jayber Crow and be inspired to go the unreached peoples of the world. This is not a critique as much as a simple statement of fact. A writer cannot cover every topic and missions is not Berry’s wheelhouse. I bring him up to imagine what it would be like if someone with a similar worldview and gift for writing would take up the pen to write an earth-saturated tale with one of the following storylines:

    • A rural pastor from a midwestern farming town becomes a missionary in sub-Saharan Africa to train pastors in a Bible school. As he learns the culture, he comes face to face with the reality that the peoples’ local resources are being pillaged by Chinese officials who are paying off unscrupulous indigenous government employees. Understanding that their way of life is about to be changed forever, the missionary is now faced with unexpected difficulties in how he is to teach.
    • A Chicago woman leaves her home in the 1960s to become a missionary among a people who work for British tea plantations in the secluded mountains of northern India. There is no clear plotline, nor is it a “page turner.” Just a story about a woman who learns over a period of decades what it looks like to be the hands and feet of Jesus as she lives a life of being deeply rooted in community.

          Another possibility for missions fiction is a genre of short stories. After all, there’s nothing new about case studies in missiological texts. What would it look like if we simply increased their length, detail, and overall appeal to those who love fiction?

          Lastly, it would seem helpful to American Christians who aren’t aware of how God is at work among diaspora peoples around the world to read a missiological diaspora novel. I stated above that the church inside Iran is reported to be the fastest growing in the world. Conversions to Christianity among the Iranian diaspora are also a common phenomenon. Perhaps I need to send Arman to London.

     

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Books

    Berry, Wendell. Jayber Crow. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press, 2001.

    Bradley, Mark. Too Many to Jail: The Story of Iran’s New Christians. Oxford: Monarch Books,  2014.

    Georges, Jayson. 3D Gospel: Ministry in Guilt, Shame, and Fear Cultures. Appleton, ME:           Time Press, 2017.

    Hiebert, Paul G, Shaw, R. Daniel, Tienou, Tite. Understanding Folk Religion: A Christian                        Response to Popular Beliefs and Practices. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999.

    Lewis, C.S. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Chronicles of Narnia. London: Geoffrey Bles,                    1952.

    Parks, David. Arman’s Freedom. Hartselle, AL: Soncoast Publishing, 2022.

    Richardson, Don. Peace Child. Bloomington, MN: Bethany House, 2005.

    Articles

    Richardson, Don. “Redemptive Analogy.” In Perspectives on the World Christian Movement,                  4th ed., edited by Steve Hawthorne and Ralph Winter, Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library, 2009.

    Internet

    HonorShame: Resources for Global Ministry, “Back to God’s Village.” Accessed March 24,                    2023, https://honorshame.com/videos/#close.

    House, Paul. “Wendell Berry and the Revitalized Pastor.” Accessed March 18, 2023,                    https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/wendell-berry-and-the-revitalized-pastor/. 

    MacKenzie, Sarah. “How Reading Stories Helps Children Love the Truth.” Accessed March 22,                 2023. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/reading-stories-children-love-truth/.

    Welty, Eudora. “Must the Novelist Crusade?” In The Atlantic, October 1965. Accessed March     24, 2023, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1965/10/must-the-novelist-crusade/659181/.  


    [1] Sarah MacKenzie, “How Reading Stories Helps Children Love the Truth,” accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/reading-stories-children-love-truth/. While he uses this quote often, he is not the originator and is not sure where he heard it first.

    [2] Paul G. Hiebert, R. Daniel Shaw, and Tite Tienou, Understanding Folk Religion: A      Christian Response to Popular Beliefs and Practices (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999), 37.

    [3] Gavin Ortlund, lecture at Beeson Divinity School, February 14, 2023.

    [4] Eudora Welty, “Must the Novelist Crusade?” The Atlantic (October 1965): accessed March 24, 2023. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1965/10/must-the-novelist-crusade/659181/

    [5] Jeff Christopherson, phone interview by author, February 28, 2023.

    [6] Ibid.

    [7] David Parks, Arman’s Freedom (Hartselle, AL: Soncoast Publishing, 2022).

    [8] One of the ways I seek to accomplish this is by requiring all students to sit down with someone from another religious background who grew up outside of the U.S. and ask them questions related to family, culture in general, and religious worldview. For about eight years straight, every class has illustrated that consistency in religious worldview is the exception rather than the rule.

    [9] Don Richardson, Peace Child (Bloomington, MN: Bethany House, 2005).

    [10] Don Richardson, “Redemptive Analogy,” in Perspectives on the World Christian Movement, 4th ed., edited by Ralph D. Winter and Steven C. Hawthorne, 430-436. Pasadena: William Carey Library, 2009.

    [11] C.S. Lewis, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Chronicles of Narnia (London: Geoffrey Bles, 1952).

    [12] Ibid., 263.

    [13] “Back to God’s Village,” accessed March 24, 2023. https://honorshame.com/videos/#close

    [14] Jayson Georges, 3D Gospel: Ministry in Guilt, Shame, and Fear Cultures (Time Press, 2017), p. 40.

    [15] I’ve found multiple resources quoting Operation World to confirm this, but the link is no longer available.

    [16] For example, in Mark Bradley’s 2014 book, Too Many to Jail, he goes to great length to explain how cultural, religious, and historical factors have contributed to the Iranian people’s openness to the gospel.

    [17] Wendell Berry, Jayber Crow (Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint, 2001).

    [18] Paul House, “Wendell Berry and the Revitalized Pastor,” accessed March 18, 2023. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/wendell-berry-and-the-revitalized-pastor/ 

  • Afghanistan: Is There Any Hope?

    Afghanistan: Is There Any Hope?

    Like everyone else, I watched the images of Afghans clinging to a military plane and grieved. Like everyone else, I asked the questions: What does this mean for Christians, women, those who helped U.S. troops and so many other people who are now vulnerable to the rule of the Taliban? How does this affect the soldiers who have served in Afghanistan over the past two decades? How will this affect the region? How will it affect global politics?

    Is there any hope?

    It’s when I ask that last question that I’m reminded to pray and to look to the Word of God. But which words? In difficult situations, both personally and externally, Psalm 46:10 has become a “go-to” passage for many people over the years. “Be still and know that I am God.” It’s a great promise, and we rightly look to it. But do you know the rest of the verse? “I will be exalted among the nations. I will be exalted in the earth.” Most people who quote the first part don’t know the second. Don’t believe me? Type “be still and know that I am God” into your Google search and click “images” at the top. How many memes show the rest of the verse? And where are the nations among whom God will be exalted?

    The reason this is important is because, when it comes to finding hope in the promises of God, we shouldn’t only look to our favorite verses. We should also look to the big picture. In Matthew 24:14, Jesus promised that “this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” Notice that the emphasis is not on a horror that the end will come, but a hope that the gospel will be proclaimed throughout the world. In Revelation 7, God allows us to see that this will, in fact, happen in the end: “After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, ‘Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!’”

    Christians have become unfortunately good at taking the latest tragic event and sticking it into end time prophecies, such as Matthew 24, and despondently waiting for the end to come. The thrust of Scripture, however, is to keep a hopeful eye on the gospel being spread around the world, to walk in obedience with the Great Commission and to look forward to our homecoming even in the midst of fear.

    Having said that, we can just as easily see events such as the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan and despair that the gospel of the kingdom can’t really go forward in difficult places. I remember studying missions, including missions to the Islamic world, when the attacks of September 11 occurred. Things already looked bleak, to be honest. “How much more difficult will it be now?” I thought. Little did I know.

    Did you know that more Muslims have become Christians since 9/11 than at any point in history combined? This was the overwhelming conclusion of David Garrison’s research, detailed in his 2014 book, Wind in the House of Islam. Not only has God used the usual means to spread his Word (people acting in great faith, prayer, sharing the gospel, etc.), but reports of dreams and visions have been common as well. I have personally known examples of the latter and have long ago lost my skepticism over the matter. But out of all the things God has used to bring people to himself, there is one that may surprise you even more. Terrorism.

    My experience with Iranians has convinced me that this is true. When the 1979 revolution happened, the Ayatollah Khomeini and other hardline rulers promised to bring in something much better than a democracy or a republic. They promised to bring in an Islamic Republic—the true “Government of God,” as they called it. After decades of oppression and terrorism, there are now millions of Iranians who have concluded that they need to find something else. This disillusionment with Islam, combined with the factors listed above and the loving witness of believers, has resulted in Iran being home to the fastest growing church in the world.

    Am I saying that Afghanistan is next? The truth is that I have no idea what’s about to happen. To be sure, Afghanistan is not Iran. Even before the Taliban takeover, they were already number two on Open Doors’ list of countries where persecution of Christians is most severe. The persecution of believers from their own families is more intense than in Iran. But if we take this logic, or any other logic, and conclude that God can’t do something beyond what we see possible, we’re not acting in faith that is either consistent with the big picture of the Bible or how he has worked in surprising ways throughout history.

    In times like these, we know we ought to pray. However, it’s difficult to maintain prayer when we don’t see or feel hope. It’s easier to just let the bad news play on an endless loop until we fall into the trap of despair. My brothers and sisters, this is not what God has called us to! Not only should we pray, but our requests to the Lord can be presented with full assurance that he is sovereign. As we are still before the Lord, we can be confident that he will be exalted among the nations. And the way he chooses to do so may surprise us.

    This article was originally published on the Beeson Divinity Blog

  • A Greater Story

    A Greater Story

    My favorite feature of my grandfather’s house in the East Lake section of Birmingham, Alabama was his upstairs closet. It tunneled from a master bedroom and emptied into a stairwell. When the adults weren’t looking, we’d wade through the clothes, boxes, and a small Christmas tree to find our way to the other side. What no one knew – except my grandfather, I presume – is that somewhere in one of his closets lay a stack of historic newspapers. “U.S. Mourns Slain President” and “Man Walks on the Moon,” both from the now-extinct Birmingham Post Herald, splashed the headlines as they emerged from an old dusty box.

    The most striking headline, on an edition of The Birmingham News, reads “GERMANY SURRENDERS!” The date? November 11, 1918. It was discovered after my grandfather died and my Mom decided to ask the history major (i.e. me) if I wanted to have it. My wife had it framed over 17 years ago and I now have it proudly displayed in my office. For years I’ve imagined the fun I would have showing it off to the world when the 100-year anniversary came around, but over this past Summer I realized there was a real problem with how I had envisioned this.

    Only the top of the front page is framed. The bottom half is not, and on the lower right side of the front page is a short but horrific article entitled, “Negro Lynched in Sheffield.” On November 10, 1918, after a policeman had been murdered, a mob took out their frustrations on a black man named Will Bird. He was not being accused of the crime (two other black men were being held in jail on suspicion), but since he had the reputation of being a “bad man” and had reportedly said he was “gonna get myself a cop,” the angry mob accepted rumor as fact and made themselves judge, jury, and executioner.  
    As much as I want to unabashedly celebrate the courage of my American ancestors, I don’t want dishonor my black brothers and sisters in Christ by neatly, and quite literally, eliminating our not-so-courageous history from the front page in the process. On the surface, you might say that this is obvious, but on further analysis, the reality is that our political tribalism actually makes it difficult to place competing narratives on the “front pages” of our discussions. For example, some of those in my tribe of conservatives will celebrate the USS Arizona Memorial because we need to make sure we “never forget,” but when slavery and lynchings are discussed, they respond with, “Why bring up the past?” Christians who are more on the liberal Democrat side, however, love to talk about the oppressed, but don’t want to talk about abortion even if they think it’s wrong. 
    It seems to me that American Christians tend to choose from one of two faulty understandings of history: the liberal Democrat view and the conservative Republican view. Each side has a fairly clear narrative –  reinforced daily through talk radio, cable news, and the echo chamber of our social media feeds – all of which insist that certain topics remain prominent while others are pushed to the back pages. Together they shape and reinforce a worldview that determines how they respond to any given issue. For the Christian, the common fault of both of these narratives is that they both focus exclusively on the history and current issues of our country alone.  In my Introduction to Christian Missions class, I teach our students to understand a person’s worldview, not simply through the religious label they give themselves (Hindu, Muslims, etc.), but by finding out what they believe about the some of great questions of life. How did we get here? What went wrong? How can it be fixed? What happens when we die? In the process, you may discover that the person who claims to be a Hindu is really more of an atheist and that, when they say “I’m Hindu,” it’s more of a cultural identity than religious statement. When we use these questions to analyze what American Christians are actually talking about and listening to on a day to day basis, however, two insidious narratives emerge which are very different from the Bible’s history of salvation. 

       To be sure, the above chart is simplified and limited in scope, but it illustrates the everyday narratives that reinforce our view of politics. To demonstrate the importance they serve in public discourse, look at what happens when one side contradicts the other’s view of The Fall. When a conservative Republican talks about the uniqueness of the American Constitution (or anything positive about the Founding Fathers), there will often be met with a swift and sharp critique from the other side that points to slavery. The assumption is that, since slavery existed, nothing from the entire era of history can be celebrated nor should it be emulated. On the other hand, bring up Thomas Jefferson’s edited Bible and you may be met with a flurry of objections from conservatives, whose worldview depends on early America consisting purely of pious, Bible-believing Christians faithfully attending church. Even though we needed two Great Awakenings in less than a century – one just before our country’s independence and one directly afterward – because of waning church attendance, deism, and general skepticism leftover from the Enlightenment (not to mention the existence of the evil of slavery!), this narrative persists. And why are the reactions so sharp from both sides? It’s simple. The foundation for all of our beliefs and actions have been threatened. 
      For the Christian, this shouldn’t be the case. We have the word of God with its sure foundation and beautiful narrative sufficient for all of life – including politics – for people from every tongue, tribe, and nation on earth. In Genesis 1 we see that, while the United States was not perfect in origin, our beautiful world was. The first human beings were created in the image of God and placed lovingly in a garden. Our problems began, not with the transcontinental slave trade, but when Adam and Eve sinned and the hearts of all subsequent generations were radically corrupted. It marred the image of their Maker and enabled every form of evil and wickedness known to human beings. God, however, did not give up on us. He called Abraham and promised that he would give him a new land, that he would become the father of a great nation, and that, through him, all families of the earth will be blessed (Genesis 12:1-3). His descendants eventually entered this Promised Land and were given clear instructions on how to glorify God and be a witness to the nations, but the evil within them prevented this from happening (Deut. 4:5-8, Romans 2:17-24). Instead, the people of Israel mistook responsibility for privilege and became centered on themselves, abandoning God’s law time and again. In his great mercy, God sent prophets to tell them to repent and to warn of impending judgment if they don’t. God led Jeremiah to prophesy that one day his law would not simply be external commands, but written on their hearts (Jeremiah 33:14-16). Isaiah predicted a suffering servant, by whose stripes we would be healed, would come to save us from our sins. Then the miracle. Jesus came to us, the word made flesh, to show us how to live and to die for our transgressions. He rose from the dead, demonstrating his power over sin and guaranteeing our own resurrection, then commanded his followers to make disciples of all the nations. After he ascended to Heaven, his followers were filled with the Holy Spirit and preached the gospel to those in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and began the process of spreading his word to the ends of the earth, especially through the ministry of Paul. The Bible ends with a beautiful picture of people from all tongues, tribes, and nations worshipping God around the throne just like Jesus predicted. (Matthew 24:14, Rev. 7:9-10). But the goal of history can’t be reduced to diversity. Revelation also speaks of the fall of Babylon the Great, who is said to have corrupted the world with its sexual immorality (Rev. 18:1-10). In the Bible, holiness and inclusion are not enemies.
      Since the time of the early church, the gospel of Jesus Christ has slowly made its way to the ends of the earth, even to far away countries like China and still other places that no one even knew would one day exist – like America. Sometimes it happened through the scattering and persecution of believers and sometimes through the obedience of missionaries following the call of Jesus to cross national and cultural boundaries. Today the center of gravity for the Christian faith is no longer in the West. It’s in what we call the Global South – in areas of the world below the equator, especially in Africa and parts of Asia. While many Christians in the West lament the decline of Christian influence in our culture (a tragedy over which to grieve, to be sure) we completely miss how dramatically God is still working today. Not only has the percentage of evangelical Christians remained strong in America, but more Muslims across the globe have become Christians since 9/11 than at any point in history! This is good news for Christians in a nation where we are continually warned by both sides that the end of everything good in the world is near.  
      Until Jesus returns, Christians can confidently risk honesty about the leaders and movements who represent “our side.” This is true both because we have confidence that God is in control and because our primary responsibilty isn’t fidelity to a political party. It’s faithfulness to Jesus and his beautiful gospel. I will be the first to admit that finding a balance is very confusing, and I’m certainly not advocating that we incessantly post political messages on social media, but we must try to find ways to honor the Lord in the mess that our political discourse has become. Can Republican Christians admit when our President has done or said something that contradicts Scripture or must we defend him at all cost because the next election must be won? Can Democrat Christians admit when he’s done something good or must he always be portrayed as pure evil because the next election must be won? Can we affirm the courageous self-sacrifice of the majority our police force and at the same time admit there are significant problems with bias against minorities? If we continue to cut and paste, not only will we dishonor Jesus Christ, who is the way, the TRUTH, and the life – but we also will fail to be a witness to the gospel in a world that is lost and in desperate need of Jesus.  
      The conservative Republican view only wants to see the top half of my newspaper. The liberal Democrat view only wants to see the bottom. Both are operating on the assumption that our only hope will be found in a political solution. Neither can see anything of eternal weight beyond our own borders or our own country’s history. Not only does a biblical worldview have room for both halves of the paper, but it even has leftover space for a breathtaking headline of hope. 
    “JESUS IS COMING!”

  • Smoke on the Martyrs

    Smoke on the Martyrs

    Below is an excerpt of an article I wrote that is now published at the Gospel Coalition website.

    This is difficult to write. I don’t enjoy disagreeing with those who are trying to raise awareness for the persecuted church.   We are in the midst of a clear global upsurge of attacks on Christians. In the last year we’ve seen major atrocities in Kenya, Nigeria, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Ethiopia, and other places as well. Make no mistake. The large majority of this is clearly from radical Islam and, although the majority of Muslims are not violent, an astonishingly high percentage are sympathetic to extremist violence. In the midst of this we see almost no concern on the part of the leadership of the United States. As Christians have been beheaded in dramatically produced videos designed to recruit more Muslim extremists and strike fear into the rest of the world, condemnation from the White House regarding the targeting of Christians has been underwhelming.   And in this moment when clear, consistent, and accurate voices are needed, Christians in the West are blowing a cloud of smoke into the issue by hanging their hats on a discredited and debunked statistic. There are simply not 100,000 Christian martyrs every year.

    Read the full article HERE